Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:29 AM
Some people may not understand how I organize my desk. For those of you who don't, here is a brief run down. I have one area that is the "heap", and another that is the "stack" (which has the most recently used items on top). Approximately twice a year I clear my desk in a ritual known as a "core dump". I'm still trying to find someone who will be my garbage collector.
Monday, August 20, 2007 1:08 PM
Joel on Software is lamenting about Office 2007, and even complains about the box it comes in:
I bought a retail copy of Office 2007 today (I'm loading up the new laptop I got for the world tour, which is a Thinkpad X61s), and I must be a complete spaz, but I simply could not figure out how to open the bizarre new packaging.
It's a hard plastic case, sealed in two different places by plastic stickies. It represents a complete failure of industrial design; an utter F in the school of Donald Norman's Design of Everyday Things. To be technical about it, it has no true affordances and actually has some false affordances: visual clues as to how to open it that turn out to be wrong.
My version of Office 2007 came as a download, so I never had the same experience. I can say that I had a similar experience with Apple's iPod Nano, when I bought one for my mom for Mother's Day. I was going to open up the clear plastic case that it came in, so I could load her music on it for her. It took me about 5 minutes to open it, and I almost cracked the plastic because I was trying to do it the wrong way. It was not intuitive at all.
Your very first impression of anything is the packaging. It's not a good sign when that impression is bad. Don't get me wrong... the case was beautiful, and exactly the look and type of design I'd expect from Apple. But looks should never override easy of use. I think Apple forgets that sometimes.
Monday, August 13, 2007 9:18 AM
I've talked many times before about how I don't like Digital Rights Management schemes, mostly because it makes it too hard for me to use what I purchased and now own. It feels too much like a rental scheme, where one day I'll find that my hardware won't play my music one day, or the company that created the DRM will suddenly disappear, taking my music with it. Here is a perfect example of this:
Google Inc. is shutting down a service that sold and rented online video, ending a 19-month experiment doomed by the proliferation of free clips on other websites like the Internet search leader's YouTube subsidiary.
Google has been selling the right to watch a wide range of video, including sports, music and news, since January 2006. Most of the video sold for anywhere from a couple US dollars to $20. Customers could pay less to "rent" the right to watch a selected video for a day or buy the show so it would be available to watch indefinitely.
Google spokesman Gabriel Strickler said the refunds won't materially affect the company, which has $12.5 billion in cash. Strickler declined to reveal how many people bought video through Google.
Basically Google is going to give "store credit", and hopefully you'll like something else at their store which you can then buy. Seems like a raw deal to me, which is why I still stick to DVD's and MP3's for my video and music needs.
Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:27 AM
I'm kind of curious. There was so much iPhone hype... and then people rushed out to get them... and I saw a flurry of "I'm posting from my iPhone posts" and "I'm taking a picture from my iPhone pictures"... but now not so much. So now that the new toy feel has begun to fade... was it worth the money?